|

Misc.
Resources & News
Arizona
Kansas
Georgia
Minnesota
Missouri
Montana
Ohio
Pennsylvania
Tennessee
Texas
West Virginia
International
Trials and Bills
Quotes
|
How to Teach the
Controversy Legally video by the Discovery Institute
(17.5MB Windows Media file) Want to teach the scientific
controversy over evolution but aren't sure what is allowable? This short
video clearly and concisely summarizes the legal framework for teaching
about evolution. A great resource for teachers, school board members,
and parents, this video features interviews with scientists and legal
scholars and explains how to teach the controversy over evolution in a
legally responsible manner.
Textbooks in Public Schools:
Education or Indoctrination? by Mike Riddle
"Fifty
studies were reviewed that surveyed opinions on teaching origins
in public schools. The vast majority found about 90% of the public
desired that both creation and evolution or creation only be
taught in the public schools. About 90% of Americans consider
themselves creationists of some form, and about half believe
that God created humans in their present form within the past
10,000 years. In America, about 15% of high school teachers teach
both evolution and creation, and close to 20% of high school
science teachers and about 10,000 scientists (including more
than 4,000 life scientists) reject both macroevolution and theistic
evolution. Although the vast majority of Americans desire both
creation and evolution taught in school, the evolutionary naturalism
worldview dominates, revealing a major disparity between the
population and the ruling élite." Jerry Bergman, Ph.D.
Creation
Ex Nihilo Technical Journal Vol. 13, No. 2
General Resources and News on Teaching
Origins in Public Schools
News and Resources from Specific US States
Arizona
Kansas
Georgia
Minnesota
Missouri
Montana
Ohio
Ohio News
Pennsylvania
-
Intelligent Design' Defense Opens CBS
News Oct. 17, 2005.
Michael Behe testified Monday that evolution alone can't explain
complex biological processes and he believes God is behind them.
-
Evolution Debate In Federal Court CBS News Sept. 26, 2005. Eighty
years after the Scopes Monkey Trial, the latest legal chapter in the
debate over the teaching of evolution in public schools is to unfold in
federal court.
-
Defending “design” in Dover (Pennsylvania, USA)
School policy that questions Darwin and informs about
intelligent design goes to federal court. by Pam Sheppard, staff writer,
AiG–USA. September 26, 2005
-
University of California sued for discriminating against Christian courses
Some college-prep classes deemed “too religious”. AiG–USA. September 6,
2005
-
Darwin v. 'Design' in Dover 11 parents, ACLU sue, alleging religion in
curriculum 12/15/04
-
Pennsylvania Parents File First-Ever Challenge to “Intelligent Design”
Instruction in Public Schools
"Intelligent Design" is Religious Argument, not Science, Say Parents.
December 14, 2004
-
Anti-evolution teachings gain foothold in U.S. schools - Evangelicals see
flaws in Darwinism San Francisco Chronicle 11/30/04
-
‘Intelligent design’ voted in
A Pennsylvania school
board recently voted to include intelligent design in the district's
science curriculum. 10/19/04
- Professors argue intelligent design 1/1/03 School District recently added new language to
its mission statement that permits science teachers to discuss
theories of intelligent design alongside evolution.
- Pa. school district statement sparks evolution
debate Associated Press, 12/26/2002
Tennessee
Texas
West Virginia
Wisconsin
International / Non US
Quotes
An evolutionist teacher
acknowledges exploiting students’ trust when he preaches evolution’s
doctrines in the classroom. “…I
use that trust to effectively brainwash them…our teaching methods are
primarily those of propaganda. We appeal---without demonstration---to
evidence that supports our position. We only introduce arguments and
evidence that supports the currently accepted theories and omit or gloss
over any evidence to the contrary.”
Mark Singham, “Teaching and Propaganda,”
Physics Today, (vol. 53, June 2000), p. 54; as quoted by Dr. Henry B.
Morris, Impact, supra.
|