Introduction
It is a common belief
among today's scientists that life's origin was naturally based,
and therefore abiogenesis (life from non-life) must have occurred.
Today 95% of the biologists in the National Academy of Science
are either atheist or agnostic (Nature,
Vol. 394, No. 6691, p. 313). The creation / evolution controversy
is largely a debate between theistic or atheistic philosophical
presupposition.
The Darwinian evolutionist believes that
all life on earth has evolved from a single ancestor because the the
spontaneous origin of a living cell is extremely improbable.
Likewise all organisms on earth were constructed with the same
common design, which to some indicates a
common ancestry. Abiogenesis is a theory that attempts to explain the origin of
life through random natural processes, and is taught as a regular
component of evolutionary biology. The evidence to support a spontaneous
origin of life is nonexistent, but like evolution itself is taught as
absolute fact in biology classes.
Theory of Necessity
Evolution is an attempt to offer a naturalistic
explanation for the existence of our complex ecosystem. On creation
vs. evolution debate forums, evolutionists frequently claim that abiogenesis is not a part of evolution. This debate tactic is
simply used to avoid the issue because it has never been proven despite
repeated attempts under every conceivable circumstance. Every college level course
on evolution will address abiogenesis at length, as will any evolutionary
biology textbook. Most dedicate an entire chapter to the origin of life. The following textbook
has 2 chapters dedicated to the topic.
Evolutionary Biology by Eli Minkoff Addison-Wesley Publishing 1984.
Spontaneous generation was the original
theory that proposed life could originate from nonliving matter.
It is now well known that spontaneously generate of life in our
present ecosystem is impossible. Louis Pasteur abolished the
theory of spontaneous generation in 1859 because he believed
that life was far to complex to have originated instantly from
nonliving matter. He simultaneously established the theory of
biogenesis; the origin of life from preexisting life. Hardly
more than ten years following Pasteur's experiments Thomas Huxley coined
the term abiogenesis.
I shall call the . . . doctrine that living matter may be
produced by not living matter, the hypothesis of abiogenesis.
--Huxley, 1870.
All recognized life forms are produced
by preexisting organisms known as biogenesis, and the scientific community can not
demonstrate abiogenesis under any conceivable conditions. Despite
the absence of proof, abiogenesis has become accepted by nearly all
practicing scientists. The theory
remains virtually unchanged since its inception in the 1920s,
and assumes that life originated at some point in earth's past
under conditions no longer present. The tenet of evolution can be summed-up by
the phrase "abiogenesis at first biogenesis ever since".
It is taught today as a certainty although the exact mechanisms
remain theoretical. Discussions in evolutionary biology textbooks
go to great lengths to demonstrate how abiogenesis could have
occurred under multiple primordial scenarios.
A Series of Unlikely Events
Molecular
formation: Theories concerning
molecular evolution generally assume molecules naturally coalescence
into macromolecules during times when their concentration and
atmospheric conditions favored such contact. In 1924, Alexander
I. Oparin determined which chemicals must be in the earth's atmosphere
for amino acids to form (e.g. methane, hydrogen, ammonia) and
which chemicals would prohibit the formation of amino acids (e.g.
Oxygen).
In the 1950s, Stanley L. Miller, pictured
at right, performed the first experiment attempting to reproduce
these conditions. Methane, ammonia, hydrogen and water were placed
in a flask that was subject to an electrical discharge. After
several days, the experiment yielded several organic compounds
including amino acids. Other researchers repeated these experiments
using different energy sources such as UV, and other presumed
primitive atmospheres. When hydrogen cyanide was used, even nitrogenous
bases were obtained, which are a components of the building blocks
for DNA.
However, in all of these experiments that
attempted to produce life's building blocks, molecular oxygen
was absent. The earth possesses an oxygen rich atmosphere, and
even the oldest rocks contain oxides which is evidence they were
formed in the presence of oxygen. In fact, oxides have been found
in rocks supposedly 300 million years older than the first living
cells. Oxygen is produces by all photosynthetic organisms, and
is required for metabolism by all life forms except a few microorganisms.
A hydrogen-rich reducing atmosphere was only reproduced in these
experiments because amino acids and nitrogenous bases simply
will not spontaneously form in an oxidizing environment.
"This enzyme [in E. coli] poses a
conundrum: the survival and continual evolution of an oxygen-sensitive
enzyme when oxygen appeared. On the other hand, the class I reductase
require oxygen for free radical generation. Surely they could
not have evolved and operated in the anaerobic first cell in
an oxygen-free environment." [Science, Vol. 260, p:1773-1777
1993]
UNDER CONSTRUCTION
Polymers formation: the origin of polymers such as proteins and nucleic
acids is extremely problematic. These most important biochemical
compounds are chains of subunits which in living system are asymmetrical.
or possess a chirality or handedness.
...the odds against DNA assembling by chance
are1040:1 [according to Fred Hoyle, Evolution from
Space,1981].
Prokaryote formation:
Eukaryote formation:
Eukaryotic cells are possessed by all multicellular and some single celled
organisms (protozoans). There is a vast difference between prokaryotic
cells and eukaryotic cells. In particular, the latter perform
functions inside compartmentalized structures called organelles.
Therefore, the former are called simple cells. Given this comparison, the
theory of evolution would dictate that the simple cells (prokaryotes) have
evolved into the complex cells (eukaryotes). Indeed evolutionists have
proposed that the eukaryotic cell evolved from a symbiosis or fusion of
several distinct prokaryotes. This hypothesis is known as endosymbiosis.
It is thought
that specialized eukaryotic organelles such as the mitochondria, and choroplasts
originated by internalizing aerobic bacteria like spirochaetes, and bluegreen algae
respectively.
Like
all of the theory of evolution, endosymbiosis is taught as though it is a
fact, but there remains an inexplicable distinction between these two
vastly different cell types. Eukaryotes have an extensive series of
membrane-bound organelles including the endoplasmic reticulum, golgi
apparatus, nuclear envelope. Eukaryotes also possess microtubular organelles such are
cilia and centrioles, and their chromosomes are multiple instead of single and contain
proteins as well as DNA.
"In tracking the emergence of the
eukaryotic cell, one enters a kind of wonderland where scientific
pursuit leads almost to fantasy. Cell and molecular biologists
must construct cellular worlds in their own imaginations. ...
Imagination, to some degree, is essential for grasping the key
events in cellular history." -- B.D. Dyer and R.A. Obar,
Tracing the History of Eukaryotic Cells, Columbia University Press
1994, pp. 2 & 3.
Extraterrestrial Source of Life?
Extraterrestrial sources of life are less
likely given conditions in the harsh conditions in space, but
are still considered a likely source for some critical molecules.
Did Life Come from Another World? New research indicates that
microorganisms could have survived a journey from Mars to Earth.
Scientific American Nov 2005.
More Quotes on the Origin of the Cell
"As sex seems to be present in
the vast majority of eukaryotes, the origin of meiosis is presently
unknown. Protists having optional or alternative sexual and asexual
cycles seem to be the best targets for research on the evolution
of meiosis. " Primitive forms
of meiosis: the possible evolution of meiosis. Solari AJ.Biocell
2002 Apr;26(1):1-13